Regresión de calcificaciones vasculares en paciente con calcifilaxia / Regression of vascular calcification in a patient with calciphylaxis

No disponible

Use of α1-microglobulin for diagnosing chronic interstitial nephropathy.

α1-Microglobulin (α1M) is a low molecular weight protein and has been best characterized for detecting acute lesions of proximal tubules (Bonventre in Contrib Nephrol 156:213-219, 2007). This study has tried to evaluate the use of α1M for the differential diagnosis of chronic interstitial nephropathy. 145 patients were recruited [81 men and 64 women, mean age 61.8 ± 16.7 years, 64.8 % have an estimated glomerular filtration (GFR) <60 ml/min]. Urinary α1M was evaluated using an immunonephelometric assay. 82 patients were diagnosed as having chronic interstitial nephritis (CIN), and 46 patients have been previously diagnosed of glomerulonephritis (GN). A group of hypertensive patients without renal disease was used as control (n = 17). Patients in GN group had the highest α1M excretion (15.05 mg/24 h). When the α1M/albuminuria rates were calculated, the CIN group had the highest rate (1.03 mg/mg) and the GN group had the lowest rate (0.04 mg/mg) (p < 0.001). When the α1M/proteinuria rates were calculated, the results were rather similar. The AUC for CIN group was 0.785, and the one for GN group was 0.139. Patients with estimated GFR <60 ml/min showed a higher excretion of α1M (18.75, 8.75-40.00 mg/24 h). Nevertheless, α1M/albuminuria and α1M/proteinuria rates were still higher in CIN patients with GFR ≥60 ml/min. α1M urinary excretion is increased in chronic interstitial nephropathy and glomerulonephritis as well as in patients with GFR <60 ml/min. The α1M/albuminuria rate and the α1M/proteinuria quotient are increased in chronic interstitial nephropathies but decreased in glomerular diseases.

Incidence of diabetes mellitus requiring insulin treatment after renal transplantation in patients with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been associated with an increased incidence of diabetes mellitus, both in the general population and among transplant patients. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we reviewed the records of 1614 patients who had undergone renal transplant at six Spanish centres between 1992 and 1998. We established the rate of onset of diabetes mellitus requiring >1 month of treatment with insulin (insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, I-TDM) among the 177 patients showing HCV antibody seropositivity at the time of transplant (HCV+ group). As controls, 177 HCV patients were selected who had received a kidney allograft immediately before or after the study patients at the same centre. RESULTS: The HCV+ patients were well matched with controls in terms of characteristics (except a longer time on dialysis) and immunosuppressive treatment. After a mean follow-up of 44 months, 28 cases of I-TDM were diagnosed (9.6% in HCV+ and 6.2% HCV-, not significant (NS); odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 0.75-3.50). The onset of I-TDM was somewhat later in HCV+ patients (467 days vs. 292 days in HCV- patients, NS). Multivariate analysis identified the following prognostic factors for I-TDM onset: age and BMI at the time of transplant, and polycystic kidney disease as the underlying cause of chronic renal insufficiency. No correlation was found with HCV positivity or time on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to confirm a greater incidence of post-renal transplant insulin-requiring diabetes in association with HCV infection. However, the observed tendency towards such an association suggests that the follow-up period would need to be extended.